Social Reproduction Theory, Hegemony and Epistemicide as a Historical Materialist Framework for Evaluating Intersectional Research on Race, Gender, Disability and Class: A Method for Social Science Literature Reviews

Authors

  • Piper A Bell The University of Queensland, Australia
  • Aidan Cornelius-Bell The University of South Australia, Australia
  • Sharlene Leroy-Dyer The University of Queensland, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v5i5.398

Keywords:

Social Reproduction Theory, Hegemony, Epistemicide, Historical Materialism, Intersectionality, Knowledge Production, Framework

Abstract

In this paper, we present an historical materialist framework to evaluate academic research literature focused on intersecting systems of oppression, specifically race, gender, disability and class. We integrate social reproduction theory (SRT) and Gramsci’s concept of hegemony, as well as theorisation on decolonisation, epistemicide and disability, as a proposed framework to critically assess literature in higher education. SRT emphasises the significance of unpaid domestic and care work in maintaining capitalist relations, highlighting how gender and race are integral to capitalism’s functioning. Gramsci’s notion of hegemony is explored to show how dominant ideologies are perpetuated in academia through cultural institutions. We additionally explore imperialism and epistemicide, which marginalise non-western and Indigenous knowledge systems, reinforcing expropriative capitalism. We critique the exclusion of scholars with disability and scholars of colour, emphasising systemic ableism and racism within academic structures. We assert that deploying an intersectional analysis for systematic literature reviews reveals how multiple oppressions shape educational experiences, and urge scholars to consider positionality and reflexivity in their research. Our proposed framework includes guiding questions for researchers to analyse dimensions such as the treatment of oppression, author positionality and alignment with participant voices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahlstrand, J. L. (2024). Rags to riches: A critical analysis of social mobility discourse, ideology and power in neoliberal Indonesia. Discourse & Society, https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265241257627

Anderson, P. (1976). The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. 100(1), 5–78.

Andreotti, V., Ahenakew, C., & Cooper, G. (2011). Epistemological pluralism: Ethical and pedagogical challenges in higher education. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 7(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10/gf8vmb

Arbon, V. (2004). Bothways and beyond: Cultural standards. A Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues, 8.

Arvin, M., Tuck, E., & Morrill, A. (2013). Decolonizing feminism: Challenging connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy. Feminist Formations, 25(1), 8-34.

Barrineau, S., Schnaas, U., & Håkansson, L. (2021). Students as change agents: Reorienting higher education pedagogy for wicked times. In S. S. Serger, A. Malmberg, & M. Benner (Eds.), Renewing higher education: Academic leadership in times of transformation (pp. 267–286). Lund University. https://lubcat.lub.lu.se/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=7115721

Bat, M., Kilgariff, C., & Doe, T. (2014). Indigenous tertiary education – we are all learning: Both-ways pedagogy in the Northern Territory of Australia. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.890575

Beauchamp-Pryor, K. (2012). From absent to active voices: Securing disability equality within higher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(3), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2010.489120

Bell, P. A., & Cornelius-Bell, A. (2024). Rethinking capitalist governance of higher

education towards an anarcho-syndicalist model for academia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 5(4), 8-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.61186/johepal.5.4.8

Bennett, K. (2007). Epistemicide!: The tale of a predatory discourse. The Translator, 13(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2007.10799236

Bezanson, K., & Luxton, M. (Eds.). (2006). Social reproduction: Feminist political economy challenges neo-liberalism. McGill-Queen’s University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773576902

Bhattacharya, T. (2017a). Introduction: Mapping social reproduction theory. In T. Bhattacharya (Ed.), Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j

Bhattacharya, T. (Ed.). (2017b). Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j

Biel, R. (2015). Eurocentrism and the communist movement. Kersplebedeb Publishing.

Blanch, F. R. & W. (2010). The silences waiting: Young Nunga males, curriculum and rap. Curriculum Perspectives, 30(1), 1–13.

Braddock, D. L., Parish, S. (2001). An institutional history of disability. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies. SAGE. https://access.library.unisa.edu.au/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/sagehbdis/an_institutional_history_of_disability/0?institutionId=4638

Castell, E., Bullen, J., Garvey, D., & Jones, N. (2018). Critical reflexivity in Indigenous and cross-cultural psychology: A decolonial approach to curriculum? American Journal of Community Psychology, 62(3–4), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12291

Connell, R. (2013). Why do market ‘reforms’ persistently increase inequality? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 279–285.

Cooms, S., Muurlink, O., & Leroy-Dyer, S. (2022). Intersectional theory and disadvantage: A tool for decolonisation. Disability & Society, 39(2), 453-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2071678

Cornelius-Bell, A., & Bell, P. A. (2021). The academic precariat post-COVID-19. Fast Capitalism, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.32855/fcapital.202101.001

Cornelius-Bell, A., & Bell, P. A. (2024). Educational hegemony: Angloshperic education institutions and the potential of organic intellectuals. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 4(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v4i1.213

Cornelius-Bell, A., & Bell, P. A. (2025). Power and the game of higher education: Self-validating aggrandisement or transformational praxis? In A. Walker, H. Grimmett, & A. Black (Eds.), Ludic inquiries into power and pedagogy in higher education: How games play us (pp. 45–57). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003450979-5

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Crimmins, G. (Ed.). (2019). Strategies for resisting sexism in the academy: Higher education, gender and intersectionality. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04852-5

Croucher, G. (2022). Fees and HECS and the politics of access to university. In J. Horne & M. A. M. Thomas (Eds.), Australian Universities: A conversation about public good (pp. 151–162). Sydney University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv31svrqv.16

Davison, T. (2024, May 14). Budget 2024 balancing act: Easing cost-of-living, with an eye on inflation. Lens. Monash University. https://lens.monash.edu/@politics-society/2024/05/14/1386723/budget-2024-balancing-act-easing-cost-of-living-with-an-eye-on-inflation

de Sousa Santos, B. (2015). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634876

Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (2016). Ethical Futures in qualitative research: Decolonizing the politics of knowledge. Routledge.

Dolmage, J. (2017). Academic ableism: Disability and higher education. University of Michigan Press.

Federici, S. (2020). Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle (Second edition). PM Press.

Fraser, N. (2017). Crisis of care? On the social-reproductive contradictions of contemporary capitalism. In T. Bhattacharya (Ed.), Social Reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j

Fraser, N. (2022). Cannibal capitalism: How our System is devouring democracy, care, and the planet and what we can do about it. Verso Books.

Fredericks, B. (2010). Re-empowering ourselves: Australian Aboriginal women. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(3), 546-550. https://doi.org/10.1086/648511

Green, J. (2017). Taking more account of Indigenous feminism: An introduction. In J. Green (ed), Making space for Indigenous feminism, Fernwood Publishing.

Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Haymarket Books.

Gramsci, A. (1996). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Lawrence and Wishart.

Haegele, J. A., & Hodge, S. (2016). Disability discourse: Overview and critiques of the medical and social models. Quest (National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education), 68(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2016.1143849

Hall, B. L., & Tandon, R. (2017). Decolonization of knowledge, epistemicide, participatory research and higher education. Research for All, 1(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.01.1.02

Henry, E., & Leroy-Dyer, S. (2024). De-othering: Indigenous perspectives on diversity, equity and inclusion. Critical Perspectives on International Business (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-05-2024-0043

Heywood, W., Myers, P., Powell, A., Meikle, G., & Nguyen, D. (2022). National student safety survey: Report on the prevalence of sexual harassment and sexual assault among university students in 2021. The Social Research Centre, Melbourne.

Kumar, R. (2012). Neoliberal education and imagining strategies of resistance: An introduction. In Education and the Reproduction of Capital (pp. 1–13). Springer.

Lenette, C. (2022). Cultural safety in participatory arts-based research: How can we do better?, Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 3(1). http://doi.org/10.35844/001c.32606

Leroy-Dyer, S. (2018). Aboriginal enabling pedagogies and approaches in Australia: Centring and decolonising our approaches. International Studies in Widening Participation, 5(2), 4-9.

Leroy-Dyer, S., & Menzel, K. (2023). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander inclusion in the workplace. In B. Carlson, M. Day, S. O’Sullivan, & T. Kennedy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Australian Indigenous peoples and futures (1st ed., pp. 81–102). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003271802-8

Leroy-Dyer, S., & Heckenberg, S. (2022, March 31). The Gap will never close if Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students don’t feel safe on university campuses. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/the-gap-will-never-close-if-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-students-dont-feel-safe-on-university-campuses-180234

Liddle, C. (2014). Intersectionality and Indigenous feminism: An Aboriginal woman’s perspective. The Postcolonialist. http://postcolonialist.com/civil-discourse/intersectionality-indigenous-feminism-aboriginal-womans-perspective/

Marginson, S. (1999). The enterprise university comes to Australia. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education (pp. 1–17). Monash Centre for Research in International Education

Marginson, S. (2016). Global stratification in higher education. In S. Slaughter & B. J. Taylor (Eds.), Higher education, stratification, and workforce development: Competitive advantage in Europe, the US, and Canada (pp. 13–34). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21512-9_2

Menzel, K., & Bennett, B. (2024). Developing inclusive assessment practices within higher education: An Indigenist perspective. In C. Evans & M. Waring (Eds.), Research Handbook on Innovations in Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education (pp. 294–311). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Merchant, W., Read, S., D’Evelyn, S., Miles, C., & Williams, V. (2019). The insider view: Tackling disabling practices in higher education institutions. Higher Education, 80(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00479-0

Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000). Talkin'up to the white woman: Aboriginal women and feminism. Univ. of Queensland Press.

Payne, T. (2022). The 2020 Job-ready Graduates Package and what it means for students. In J. Horne & M. A. M. Thomas (Eds.), Australian Universities: A conversation about public good (pp. 163–176). Sydney University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv31svrqv.17

Paraskeva, J. M. (2016). Curriculum epistemicide: Towards an itinerant curriculum theory (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734781

Parsons, A. L., Reichl, A. J., & Pedersen, C. L. (2017). Gendered ableism: Media representations and gender role beliefs’ effect on perceptions of disability and sexuality. Sexuality and Disability, 35(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-016-9464-6

Phelan, P., Meyers, O., Mcalear, S., Evans, J., Menzel, K., & Bennett, B. (2024). Enhancing equity in clinical social work education: Supporting Indigenous queer and gender diverse students and researchers'. Clinical Social Work Journal (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-024-00938-x

Rocca, E., & Anjum, R. L. (2020). Complexity, reductionism and the biomedical model. In R. L. Anjum, S. Copeland, & E. Rocca (Eds.), Rethinking Causality, complexity and evidence for the unique patient (pp. 75–94). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41239-5_5

Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Zed Books.

Soldatic, K., Somers, K., Spurway, K., & van Toorn, G. (2017). Emplacing Indigeneity and rurality in neoliberal disability welfare reform: The lived experience of Aboriginal people with disabilities in the West Kimberley, Australia. Environment and Planning. A, 49(10), 2342–2361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17718374

Susack, C. (2015). Indigenous feminisms in Canada. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 23(4), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2015.1104595

Downloads

Published

2025-09-08

How to Cite

Bell, P. A., Cornelius-Bell, A., & Leroy-Dyer, S. (2025). Social Reproduction Theory, Hegemony and Epistemicide as a Historical Materialist Framework for Evaluating Intersectional Research on Race, Gender, Disability and Class: A Method for Social Science Literature Reviews. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 5(5), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v5i5.398

Issue

Section

Articles