Practices and Attitudes Regarding MOOCs and Artificial Intelligence Use among Medical Students in Morocco
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v6i5.573Keywords:
Massive Open Online Courses, Artificial Intelligence, Medical Education, Medical Students, MoroccoAbstract
Purpose: Medical education has known a fast transformation with the emergence of new learning technologies, particularly Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and artificial intelligence (AI). However, there is limited documentation on their use by medical students in the Moroccan context. This study aimed to explore the use, practices, and perceptions of MOOCs and AI by medical students in Morocco. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out among medical students from the 1st to the 7th year at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Casablanca in October 2025. A structured questionnaire was used and descriptive analysis was employed. Results: A total of 316 students were included. Although 58.5% of students were familiar with MOOCs, only 15.8% had actively participated in one. Coursera was the most used platform (44.71%), and Anatomy was the most studied subject (64.0%). The main objective was to complement medical studies (76.0%). Time constraints (79.2%) and motivation issues (58.3%) were the main barriers. Most students used AI for learning (91.77%). Chatbots were the most frequently used AI tools (86.6%), with ChatGPT being the most reported platform (52.17%). The main purpose of AI use was to explain medical concepts (87.1%). Although 95.5% reported improved understanding and 91.4% reported time savings, only 32.1% trusted AI-generated output, while 61.7% feared becoming dependent on these tools. Conclusion: Most medical students use AI, but not many actively participate in MOOCs. Selected MOOCs should be included in medical school programs and training in responsible AI use should be integrated in medical curricula.
Downloads
References
Aboshady, O. A., Radwan, A. E., Eltaweel, A. R., Azzam, A., Aboelnaga, A. A., Hashem, H. A., et al. (2015). Perception and use of massive open online courses among medical students in a developing country: Multicentre cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 5(1), Article e006804. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006804
Alammari, D., Alamari, E., Alamri, R., Alharbi, R., Felimban, J., & Aljohani, J. (2025). Assessing medical students' attitudes, performance, and usage of ChatGPT in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 1577911. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1577911
Alaran, M. A., Lawal, S. K., Jiya, M. H., Egya, S. A., Ahmed, M. M., Abdulsalam, A., et al. (2025). Challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence in African health space. Digital Health, 11, Article 20552076241305915. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241305915
Alser, M., & Waisberg, E. (2023). Concerns with the usage of ChatGPT in academia and medicine: A viewpoint. American Journal of Medicine Open, 9, Article 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100036
Barteit, S., Guzek, D., Jahn, A., Bärnighausen, T., Jorge, M. M., Neuhann, F., et al. (2020). Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 145, Article 103726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726
Clark, R., & Marks, L. (2020). MOOCs and medical education: Hope or hype? MedEdPublish, 9, Article 124. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000124.1
Duan, S., Liu, C., Rong, T., Zhao, Y., & Liu, B. (2025). Integrating AI in medical education: A comprehensive study of medical students' attitudes, concerns, and behavioral intentions. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), Article 599. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07177-9
EMfeka, Z., Turner, A., Wolvaardt, J. E., & Muganhiri, D. (2024). Evaluation of choices and time spent on an open online elective course by undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. South African Medical Journal, 114(6b), e1385.
Farhadi, Z., Rezaei, E., Bazrafkan, L., Amini, M., Sanaiey, N. Z., Barati-Boldaji, R., et al. (2024). Need assessment of medical school curriculum for MOOCs: Perspectives of instructors and students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), Article 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05102-0
Ganjavi, C., Eppler, M., O'Brien, D., Ramacciotti, L. S., Ghauri, M. S., Anderson, I., et al. (2024). ChatGPT and large language models (LLMs) awareness and use: A prospective cross-sectional survey of U.S. medical students. PLOS Digital Health, 3(9), Article e0000596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000596
Homolak, J. (2023). Opportunities and risks of ChatGPT in medicine, science, and academic publishing: A modern Promethean dilemma. Croatian Medical Journal, 64(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2023.64.1
Jaleel, A., Aziz, R., Farid, G., & Bashir, M. Z. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT on academic integrity in medical education: A developing nation perspective. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1554444. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1554444
Kovari, A. (2025). Ethical use of ChatGPT in education: Best practices to combat AI-induced plagiarism. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1465703. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1465703
Kumar, R., Rajesh, S., Kanna, K. R., & Sujin, S. R. (2021). Knowledge and perception of massive open online courses among medical students of Perambalur district, Tamilnadu, India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 8(6), 2908–2915. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20211993
Maaß, L., Grab-Kroll, C., Koerner, J., Öchsner, W., Schön, M., Messerer, D., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in medical education: A cross-sectional questionnaire on students' competence. Journal of CME, 14(1), Article 2437293. https://doi.org/10.1080/28338073.2024.2437293
Ogundiya, O., Rahman, T. J., Valnarov-Boulter, I., & Young, T. M. (2024). Looking back on digital medical education over the last 25 years and looking to the future: Narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, Article e60312. https://doi.org/10.2196/60312
Pradnya. (2025, June 19). Coursera statistics 2026: Market share & students data. Open2Study. https://www.open2study.com/statistics/coursera-statistics/
Sun, L., Yin, C., Xu, Q., & Zhao, W. (2023). Artificial intelligence for healthcare and medical education: A systematic review. American Journal of Translational Research, 15(7), 4820–4828.
Thomae, A. V., Witt, C. M., & Barth, J. (2024). Integration of ChatGPT into a course for medical students: Explorative study on teaching scenarios, students' perception, and applications. JMIR Medical Education, 10, Article e50545. https://doi.org/10.2196/50545
Thompson, R. A. M., Shah, Y. B., Aguirre, F., Stewart, C., Lallas, C. D., & Shah, M. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence use in medical education: Best practices and future directions. Current Urology Reports, 26(1), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-025-01277-1
Wu, Y., Zheng, Y., Feng, B., Yang, Y., Kang, K., & Zhao, A. (2024). Embracing ChatGPT for medical education: Exploring its impact on doctors and medical students. JMIR Medical Education, 10, Article e52483. https://doi.org/10.2196/52483
Yousef, M., Deeb, S., & Alhashlamon, K. (2025). AI usage among medical students in Palestine: A cross-sectional study and demonstration of AI-assisted research workflows. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), Article 693. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07272-x
Zhu, H., Xu, J., Wang, P., Bian, J., Zhao, Z., Liu, H., et al. (2023). The irreplaceable role of medical massive open online courses in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), Article 323. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04315-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amal Barkouk, Laila Ouerdi, Manar Jallal, Zineb Serhier, Mohammed Bennani Othmani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by CJESS are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits third parties to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon the original work provided that the original work and source is appropriately cited.
