Statistical Method to Assess Mathematical Skills of Primary School Students through STEM Education in Perspective of Block-Based Programming Scratch
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v5i5.410Keywords:
Mathematical Education, STEM, Scratch, Pedagogical Skills, Block Based Pro- GrammingAbstract
In modern education the latest technologies accompanied with traditional teaching skills have enormous scope. Especially, in mathematical education the computational skills play a pivotal role. This paper presents the assessments made in mathematical education in relation to STEM and Scratch. Our goal is to investigate how the mathematical concepts like geometry, algebra when taught by new techniques based on visualization significantly improve the understanding of the primary school students. Our focus is on (a) emotional (b) behavioral (c) cognitive skills. Therefore, we designed an experiment in which 44 students were given a task accompanied by applying the traditional teaching methodologies. The same 44 students were given the same questionnaire of mathematical concepts after delivering lecture through Scratch and blended STEM education. Based on statistical analysis significant improvement (with p-value < 0.001) has been observed in students in terms of understanding circle, line and angle concepts. Moreover, training raised the cognitive, behavioral, emotional and overall engagement scores by 9.682, 1.045, 10.932, 21.227, respectively.
Downloads
References
Al-Othman, A. A., & Almawash, F. A. (2020). The Impact of Teaching Programming by using Scratch on Self-motivation towards Learning Programming for Primary School Students in Riyadh. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies [JEPS], 14(1), 54- 70.
Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2019). Creating a continuum of STEM models: Exploring how K-12 science teachers conceptualize STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1701-1720.
Dohn, N. B. (2020). Students’ interest in Scratch coding in lower secondary mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 71-83.
Dorouka, P., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020). Tablets and apps for promot- ing robotics, mathematics, STEM education and literacy in early childhood education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(2), 255-274.
English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 5-24.
Fidai, A., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). “Scratch”-ing Computational Think- ing with Arduino: A Meta-Analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 100726.
Franklin, D. (2020). TIPP&SEE: A Previewing Navigating Strategy for Use/Modify Scratch Activities. In Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Hermans, F., & Aivaloglou, E. (2017). To scratch or not to scratch? A controlled experi- ment comparing plugged first and unplugged first programming lessons. In Proceedings of the 12th workshop on primary and secondary computing education (pp. 49-56).
Iskrenovic-Momcilovic, O. (2020). Improving Geometry Teaching with Scratch. Interna- tional Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), em0582.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11.
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and ed- ucation: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2.
Mart´ın-P´aez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & V´ılchez-Gonz´alez, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799-822.
Nguyen, H. D., Do, N. V., Tran, N. P., Pham, X. H., & Pham, V. T. (2020). Some criteria of the knowledge representation method for an intelligent problem solver in STEM education. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2020.
Oh, M. J. (2017). Non-Major Students’ Perceptions of Programming Education Using the Scratch Programming Language. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 20(1), 1-11.
Ortiz-Colon, A. M., & Romo, J. L. M. (2016). Teaching with Scratch in compulsory sec- ondary education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(02), 67-70.
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Orfanakis, V., & Zaranis, N. (2017). The appropriate- ness of scratch and app inventor as educational environments for teaching introductory programming in primary and secondary education. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 12(4), 58-77.
Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759-774.
Rodr´ıguez-Mart´ınez, J. A., Gonz´alez-Calero, J. A., & S´aez-L´opez, J. M. (2020). Computa- tional thinking and mathematics using Scratch: an experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316-327.
Salac, J., Thomas, C., Butler, C., Sanchez, A., & Franklin, D. (2020). TIPPSEE: A Learn- ing Strategy to Guide Students through Use-Modify Scratch Activities. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 79-85).
Sintema, E. J., & Phiri, P. A. (2018). An investigation of zambian mathematics student teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Basic and Applied Research International, 24(2), 70-77.
Topalli, D., Cagiltay, N. E. (2018). Improving programming skills in engineering education through problem-based game projects with Scratch. Computers Education, 120, 64-74.
Wan, Z. H., Jiang, Y., & Zhan, Y. (2020). STEM Education in Early Childhood: A Review of Empirical Studies. Early Education and Development, 1-23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M Asif Farooq, Noreen T, Mehmood T, Muhammad Qasim, Asif Mushtaq

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by CJESS are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits third parties to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon the original work provided that the original work and source is appropriately cited.